Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs BMW 3 series 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 450 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 30 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 130 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 40 litres | |
920 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is 7 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 5 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 480 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 2`085 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 22 000 | 30 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |