Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo Giulia and Skoda Superb have the same engine power, but Alfa Romeo Giulia torque is 40 NM more than Skoda Superb. Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 66 litres | |
| 1070 km with real consumption | 1170 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Superb) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Giulia) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is 23 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 625 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`374 | 2`128 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
| |