Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Tesla Model 3 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 5.6 seconds | |
|
Tesla Model 3 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo Giulia engine produces 175 HP less power than Tesla Model 3, but torque is 30 NM more than Tesla Model 3. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo Giulia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.2 l/100km | =LNG_NAV_DATU?> | |
| Range per fill-up: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 448 km in combined cycle | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo Giulia is 6 cm shorter than the Tesla Model 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 649 litres | |
|
Tesla Model 3 has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo Giulia has 169 litres less trunk space than the Tesla Model 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Giulia is 0.8 metres less than that of the Tesla Model 3, which means Alfa Romeo Giulia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`060 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Tesla Model 3 has
| |
