Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.1 - 2.9 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.5 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo Giulia is 27 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`444 | ~ 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 29 200 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |