Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Alfa Romeo Giulia
2016 -
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Alfa Romeo Giulia is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.1 - 2.91.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 510 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 380 - 600 NM220 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 3.9 - 8.4 seconds5.9 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 8.53.7 - 9.9
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
Alfa Romeo Giulia is larger, but lower.
Alfa Romeo Giulia and Volvo S60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1749 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`444~ 2`087
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 22 80011 400
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S60 has
    • available with 4x4 drive
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv