Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Skoda Superb 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is available only with rear wheel drive, while Skoda Superb can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.1 - 2.9 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 120 - 272 HP | |
Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | 5.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.5 | 4.2 - 7.1 | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Alfa Romeo Giulia is 23 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 625 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`444 | ~ 2`139 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 600 | 23 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |