Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.1 - 2.9 | 1.6 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 156 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 250 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | 4 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.5 | 4.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.22 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`444 | ~ 2`089 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Mercedes C class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |