Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs Jaguar XE 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jaguar XE can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.1 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 163 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 280 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | 5.1 - 7.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.5 | 4.2 - 7.5 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XE. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo Giulia is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar XE, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo Giulia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`444 | ~ 2`176 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XE scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XE scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |