Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs BMW 4 series 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 510 HP | 150 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 600 NM | 270 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 - 9.7 seconds | 4.8 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 11.4 | 4.0 - 7.1 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 4 series. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia and BMW 4 series are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo Giulia is 1 metres less than that of the BMW 4 series, which means Alfa Romeo Giulia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`094 kg | ~ 2`145 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 4 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 4 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 33 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |