Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016 vs BMW 4 series 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 4 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.1 - 2.9 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 510 HP | 150 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 270 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.9 - 8.4 seconds | 4.8 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 8.5 | 4.0 - 7.1 | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 4 series. On average, Alfa Romeo Giulia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 4 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia and BMW 4 series are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`444 | ~ 2`145 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 4 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 4 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 42 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |