Alfa Romeo GTV 2002 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo GTV engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo GTV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo GTV could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo Spider | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo GTV might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Alfa Romeo GTV engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
| Alfa Romeo GTV is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GTV is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 110 litres | 283 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo GTV has 173 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo GTV has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |