Alfa Romeo GTV 2002 vs BMW Z3 1998

 
Alfa Romeo GTV
2002 - 2003
BMW Z3
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 150 HP193 HP
Torque: 181 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds6.8 seconds
BMW Z3 is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo GTV engine produces 43 HP less power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 99 NM less than BMW Z3. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo GTV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.29.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km10.2 l/100km
The Alfa Romeo GTV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo GTV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway680 km on highway
790 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo GTV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW Z3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo SpiderInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo GTV might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.02 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.32 m1.31 m
Alfa Romeo GTV is larger.
Alfa Romeo GTV is 26 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GTV is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 110 litres210 litres
BMW Z3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo GTV has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z3. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo GTV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`570
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 820011 600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo GTV has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
BMW Z3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv