Alfa Romeo GTV 2003 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 289 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo GTV engine produces 22 HP more power than Chrysler Crossfire, but torque is 21 NM less than Chrysler Crossfire. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo GTV reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 10.4 | |
|
The Chrysler Crossfire is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo GTV consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo GTV could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Crossfire gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Crossfire) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is larger. Alfa Romeo GTV is 24 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 1 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GTV is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 215 litres | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo GTV has 60 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo GTV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 1.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Crossfire, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo GTV has
|
Chrysler Crossfire has
| |