Alfa Romeo GTV 1998 vs Ford Puma 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 3.0 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 - 220 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 - 271 NM | 122 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 9.2 seconds | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 11.7 | 7.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Puma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo GTV is 30 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 11 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GTV is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 2 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`778 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Puma has
| |