Alfa Romeo GTV 2003 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
Torque: | 181 - 289 NM | 170 - 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 8.5 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 13.2 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
Alfa Romeo GTV petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
Alfa Romeo GTV is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GTV is 1.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Alfa Romeo GTV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`805 | ~ 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |