Alfa Romeo GT 2007 vs BMW 1 series 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo GT engine produces 54 HP less power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 95 NM less than BMW 1 series. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo GT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Alfa Romeo GT consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo GT could require 225 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo GT consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Alfa Romeo GT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 147, Fiat Bravo | Used also on BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo GT is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo GT is 13 cm longer than the BMW 1 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo GT is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 370 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo GT has 50 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo GT uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GT is 1.3 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series, which means Alfa Romeo GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo GT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |