Alfa Romeo GT 2004 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.7 - 3.2 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 240 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 163 - 305 NM | 167 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 10.6 seconds | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 12.4 | 5.8 - 9.5 | |
|
Alfa Romeo GT petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Alfa Romeo GT equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.47 m | |
| Alfa Romeo GT is 15 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo GT is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo GT is 0.7 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Alfa Romeo GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`577 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |