Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 226 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 275 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 79 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda Xedos 6. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 9.1 | |
The Mazda Xedos 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
770 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.36 m | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger. Alfa Romeo 166 is 16 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 6, 12 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 390 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 166 has 110 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Xedos 6, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`700 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |