Alfa Romeo 166 2002 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 50 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 8.9 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volvo S80 1999 2.4 engine: The strengths of this engine lie in its durable components, long lifespan, reliability in everyday use, and substantial power reserves.
However, there are notable weaknesses. Early models were equipped ... More about Volvo S80 1999 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 166 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Alfa Romeo 166 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |