Alfa Romeo 166 2002 vs Kia Clarus 1997

 
Alfa Romeo 166
2002 - 2003
Kia Clarus
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP133 HP
Torque: 304 NM171 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive.
Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 17 HP more power than Kia Clarus, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Kia Clarus. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.59.7
The Alfa Romeo 166 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Clarus, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 166 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
1240 km on highway750 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.70 m
Width: 1.82 m1.77 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger.
Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 490 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data764 litres
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity.
Alfa Romeo 166 has 66 litres more trunk space than the Kia Clarus.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`770
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1200no data
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Kia Clarus has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv