Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs SAAB 9-5 1997

 
Alfa Romeo 166
1998 - 2002
SAAB 9-5
1997 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Alfa Romeo 166) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (SAAB 9-5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 136 HP150 HP
Torque: 304 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.8 seconds
Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 14 HP less power than SAAB 9-5, but torque is 64 NM more than SAAB 9-5. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.39.2
The Alfa Romeo 166 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-5, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 166 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1100 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.80 m
Width: 1.82 m1.79 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 166 is 8 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.8 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-5, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`800
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 14001000
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
SAAB 9-5 has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv