Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Rover 75 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 14 HP less power than Rover 75, but torque is 119 NM more than Rover 75. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 166 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 166 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 4 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Alfa Romeo 166 has 68 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |