Alfa Romeo 166 2002 vs Volvo S80 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 155 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 187 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 8 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.5 | |
Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 166 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Alfa Romeo 166 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The Volvo S80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |