Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Kia Cerato 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 45 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Kia Cerato. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 660 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger, but lower. Alfa Romeo 166 is 24 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 345 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 166 has 145 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |