Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 35 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is 20 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 166 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 166 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |