Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Rover 75 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 59 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 5.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 166 is 3 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 2 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |