Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Ford Mondeo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 6.1 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |