Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 175 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 385 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 45 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 5.6 | |
The Volkswagen Passat is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 5 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 475 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |