Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 166 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 35 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 166 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 166 could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Alfa Romeo 166 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is 20 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 166 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 166 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |