Alfa Romeo 166 1998 vs Mazda 626 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 226 HP | 76 - 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 304 NM | 158 - 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | |
| In general, Alfa Romeo 166 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 626. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 13.0 | 6.8 - 8.3 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Alfa Romeo 166 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is larger. Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 7 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 166 has 48 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`995 kg | ~ 1`663 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |