Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Alfa Romeo 166
2003 - 2007
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 3.21.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 240 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 181 - 385 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 9.9 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 13.03.4 - 5.9
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 6.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Alfa Romeo 166 equipped with diesel engines consume 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Alfa Romeo 166 is 35 cm longer than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 490 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1500 litres
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity.
Alfa Romeo 166 has 155 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`931~ 1`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 280011 600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv