Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is available with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 - 385 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 13.0 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Alfa Romeo 166 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 is 20 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 166 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 166 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`931 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |