Alfa Romeo 166 2003 vs Kia Carens 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 140 - 145 HP | |
Torque: | 181 - 385 NM | 192 - 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 9.9 seconds | 11 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 13.0 | 6.2 - 8.4 | |
Alfa Romeo 166 petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Carens. On average, Alfa Romeo 166 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.55 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.65 m | |
Alfa Romeo 166 is 18 cm longer than the Kia Carens, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 166 is 23 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2106 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 166 has 90 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carens. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 166 is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Carens, which means Alfa Romeo 166 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`931 | ~ 2`215 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 166 has
|
Kia Carens has
| |