Alfa Romeo 164 1992 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 and Ford Scorpio have the same engine power, but Alfa Romeo 164 torque is 11 NM less than Ford Scorpio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 12.6 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 164 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 164 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 164 is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
| |