Alfa Romeo 164 1992 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 engine produces 23 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Despite less power, Alfa Romeo 164 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 12.6 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 164 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 164 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 164 is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |