Alfa Romeo 164 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 164 engine produces 57 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 171 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 164 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 164 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 164 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is larger. Alfa Romeo 164 is 28 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 8 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 164 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |