Alfa Romeo 164 1992 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 164 engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 164 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.9 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo 164 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 164 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Alfa Romeo 164 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 164 is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
| |