Alfa Romeo 164 1993 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Despite the higher power, Alfa Romeo 164 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 164 could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is larger. Alfa Romeo 164 is 28 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 8 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 164 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |