Alfa Romeo 164 1992 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Alfa Romeo 164
1992 - 1994
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 146 HP143 HP
Torque: 187 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.3 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 164 engine produces 3 HP more power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 13 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite the higher power, Alfa Romeo 164 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.27.2
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 164 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 164 could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1140 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.26 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
Alfa Romeo 164 is larger, but slightly lower.
Alfa Romeo 164 is 30 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 164 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres310 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1100 litres
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage capacity.
Alfa Romeo 164 has 195 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9501`800
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 10002600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 164 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv