Alfa Romeo 164 1987 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 228 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 294 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 11.0 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Alfa Romeo 164 equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 is 21 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 164 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 has more luggage capacity. Alfa Romeo 164 has 170 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`046 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |