Alfa Romeo 164 1993 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 228 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 294 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 11.0 | 8.3 - 12.6 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Alfa Romeo 164 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is smaller. Alfa Romeo 164 is 24 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`032 | ~ 1`743 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
| |