Alfa Romeo 164 1987 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Alfa Romeo 164 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Lancer can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 228 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 294 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 11.0 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Alfa Romeo 164 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 164 is larger. Alfa Romeo 164 is 30 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 8 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 164 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 164 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Alfa Romeo 164 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`046 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 164 has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |