Alfa Romeo 159 2005 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo V50, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 159 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 159 is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 159 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 159 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Alfa Romeo 159 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`055 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 159 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |