Alfa Romeo 159 2006 vs Skoda Fabia 2010

 
Alfa Romeo 159
2006 - 2008
Skoda Fabia
2010 - 2015
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP105 HP
Torque: 175 NM154 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds10.1 seconds
Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 159 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.76.9
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 159 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway810 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 159 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.00 m
Width: 1.83 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.50 m
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but lower.
Alfa Romeo 159 is 66 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 19 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres300 litres
Alfa Romeo 159 has more luggage capacity.
Alfa Romeo 159 has 105 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Alfa Romeo 159 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9501`605
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 28003600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv