Alfa Romeo 159 2008 vs Honda Accord 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 159 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 50 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Honda Accord. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 159 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.6 | |
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 159 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Alfa Romeo 159 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Croma, Alfa Romeo Brera, Alfa Romeo Spider | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo 159 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Alfa Romeo 159 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 159 is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 467 litres | |
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 159 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Honda Accord has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Honda Accord, so Honda Accord quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 159 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |