Alfa Romeo 159 2008 vs Volvo S40 2008

 
Alfa Romeo 159
2008 - 2012
Volvo S40
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 210 HP180 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds7.9 seconds
Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo S40, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Alfa Romeo 159 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.86.2
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 159 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1220 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 159 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.48 m
Width: 1.83 m1.77 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but slightly lower.
Alfa Romeo 159 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data883 litres
Alfa Romeo 159 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S40.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1352`020
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44004600
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv