Alfa Romeo 159 2008 vs Volvo S40 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 57 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 159 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Alfa Romeo 159 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 159 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 159 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
| Alfa Romeo 159 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo S40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S40 has
| |