Alfa Romeo 159 2006 vs Mazda 6 2008

 
Alfa Romeo 159
2006 - 2008
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP140 HP
Torque: 280 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Alfa Romeo 159 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Alfa Romeo 159 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.0
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1250 km on highway
1040 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo 159 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.71 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 159 is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 445 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1751 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Alfa Romeo 159 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Alfa Romeo 159 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0952`110
Safety:
Quality:
low

high
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24002800
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv