Alfa Romeo 159 2005 vs Volvo V50 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Alfa Romeo 159
2005 - 2008
Volvo V50
2004 - 2007
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 3.21.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 120 - 260 HP100 - 220 HP
Torque: 175 - 400 NM150 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 11 seconds6.9 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 12.05.0 - 10.2
Alfa Romeo 159 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Alfa Romeo 159 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.51 m
Width: 1.83 m1.77 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but slightly lower.
Alfa Romeo 159 is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1307 litres
Despite its longer length, Alfa Romeo 159 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. This could mean that the Alfa Romeo 159 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 159 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means Alfa Romeo 159 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`105~ 1`856
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 28002200
Rating in user reviews: 9.0/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo V50 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv