Alfa Romeo 159 2008 vs Volvo S40 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 3.2 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 260 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 - 11 seconds | 6.8 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 12.1 | 3.8 - 10.0 | |
Alfa Romeo 159 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Alfa Romeo 159 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
Alfa Romeo 159 is larger, but slightly lower. Alfa Romeo 159 is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 6 cm wider, while the height of Alfa Romeo 159 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 404 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 159 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`073 | ~ 1`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S40 has
| |