Alfa Romeo 147 2005 vs Opel Astra 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 305 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Alfa Romeo 147 is more dynamic to drive. Alfa Romeo 147 engine produces 49 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Alfa Romeo 147 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Alfa Romeo 147 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Alfa Romeo 147 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Astra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Astra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Bravo, Alfa Romeo GT | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Meriva, Opel Corsa, Opel Combo | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Astra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Alfa Romeo 147 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Alfa Romeo 147 is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Alfa Romeo 147 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1330 litres | |
Opel Astra has more luggage space. Alfa Romeo 147 has 88 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 300 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Alfa Romeo 147 is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Alfa Romeo 147 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`840 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 147 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Alfa Romeo 147 has
|
Opel Astra has
| |